Reflow profile and critical temperature points
Most BGA packages have SAC-based solder balls attached. The typical reflow profiles depicted in Figure 1 show the overlay of the SAC baseline reflow profile with the other three LTS paste types employed in the INEMI LTS studies. The SAC baseline, eutectic BiSn baseline, ductile BiSn, and joint reinforced paste (JRP) were all studied to provide a fundamental understanding of the solder joint formations.
Dynamic warpage interaction with SMT defects
Electronic package dynamic warpage behavior was the key assessment for this INEMI study. The typical warpage behavior that changes with temperature is shown in Figure 2. In this graph, there are three general dynamic warpage characteristics for Packages A, B and C. The dynamic warpage of Package A best resembles a typical PBGA package while Packages B and C resemble typical FCBGA packages. Package A started off as a concave shape (-ve) and transitioned to convex as the temperature increased. Packages B and C started off as convex shapes ( ve) and transitioned to concave shapes. The difference between Packages B and C is mainly the magnitude of warpage at higher temperature where Package C has higher peak temperature warpage.
View Figure 2. Typical dynamic warpage behavior and LTS key characteristics.
The dynamic warpage metrics of LTS reflow profiles may be different from SAC profile as follows:
Reduction of peak reflow warpage from 260°C to ~182°C
Reduction of warpage at a point of initiation of solder solidification of LTS at ~150°C as compared to eutectic solidification of SAC solder at ~220°C
Warpage change during the LTS solidification phase between 150°C to 125°C where the solder may be deformed as it cools
Warpage change slope and shape inversion from convex to concave or vice versa
These temperature points were considered because of the availability of existing data of dynamic warpage for various packages. Each of these metrics was studied primarily to quantify the impact of the use of LTS on dynamic warpage behavior and perhaps explain the benefits and considerations of adopting LTS paste based on the improved dynamic warpage response of the package. Apart from dynamic warpage behavior, the package rigidity at the LTS solidification phase temperature is expected to be higher compared to the SAC solidification temperature due to the increased structural stiffness of the package at lower temperature which exerts greater tensile and shear stresses on the solder joints. This could potentially lead to the hot tearing defects mentioned previously.
By leveraging the dynamic warpage data collected across various package technologies, the Warpage Characteristics project team was able to analyze each of the warpage changes resulting from reduced peak reflow temperature, solidification temperature and solidification phase of LTS. They also compared magnitude of change between the package families (Figure 3).
View Figure 3. Warpage magnitude change for package-on-package and FBGA families.
Comparing the magnitude change can be a challenge as each package has its unique dynamic warpage characteristic. Hence the percentage of warpage change in adopting to an LTS solder system is relevant to the SAC peak warpage reflow at 260°C. Figure 4 shows the percentage of warpage change for the various families of package technology. The markers denote the trending of the warpage change where not all types of packages experience a reduction of warpage as a result of adopting LTS.
For PoP and FBGA packages, the warpage change ranges from negligible impact to a factor of ~1000%. This extreme change is due to the fact that the warpage using LTS is a few orders of magnitude higher than the warpage at 260°C. This, however, reflects the change of warpage percentage and not the absolute warpage magnitude. The majority of the package warpage change is as low as 10% to about 100%. For FCBGA and FCBGA MCP packages, the majority of the packages considered show about 20% to 100% warpage reduction and a few show warpage increases as well. This reduction seems reasonable as the results of 30% to 50% warpage reduction were reported. As for FCBGA with lids, the percentage of warpage reduction is about 20% to 50%. The even lesser change for large packages is mainly due to the constraint from the lids coupled with thicker constructions. The majority of PBGA packages shows a warpage reduction from 40% to 250%. This higher warpage reduction seen in PBGA is attributed to the higher sensitivity of the package to temperature as a result of the higher volume of mold encapsulations used.
View Figure 4. Overall peak reflow warpage reduction percentage.